Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 2019 Oct; 15(5): 1338-1344
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-213534

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of good management for cancer survivors should not be limited to only clinical care, but rather it should also include best quality of life (QOL). The objective of this study was to find out various factors affecting QOL in cervical cancer patients so that by modifying these factors, the best QOL can be provided to them. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Department of Radiotherapy, King George's Medical University (KGMU), Lucknow, from May 2015 to July 2016. The cases were selected from patients visiting the outpatient department or who were admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Department of Radiotherapy, KGMU. The data information was collected in the form of face-to-face interview using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer general cancer QOL Score 30 (EORTC QLQ C-30) and EORTC QOL questionnaire cervical cancer module (QLQ CX-24) questionnaire. Results: QOL was assessed in 85 patients. Health-related QOL was separately studied in terms of overall general QOL and cancer cervix-specific QOL, and various factors affecting QOL were studied by multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Education, tobacco use, degree of differentiation of tumor, and size of tumor were the independent factors found to have statistically significant effect on QOL of cervical cancer survivors

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-206698

ABSTRACT

Background: Acceptance of HPV vaccine is varying widely worldwide in   range of 10-70%. For increasing the acceptability for HPV vaccine, finding the obstacles and catering them diligently is required. The aim of the study was to find out acceptability rate for HPV vaccine in northern India and various obstacles and facilitators affecting acceptance of HPV vaccine.Methods: A questionnaire based descriptive study was done in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India from June 2016 to June 2017.  Questionnaire was filled by doctor after taking face to face interview of individuals. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee of the KGMU, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. (1689/Ethics/R cell/17) acceptability rate and various facilitators and obstacles for HPV vaccine were studied. For continuous variables mean with standard deviation was used. For categorical variables frequencies and percentages were used. IBM SPSS statistics applied.Results: A total of 302 cases were face to face interviewed, amongst which, 70 cases (23%) showed acceptability and 232 did not accept the vaccine. The most common obstacles were lack of knowledge and high monetary cost being the cause of nonacceptance in 48.3% and   33.6% of cases respectively.Conclusions: Higher level of awareness and knowledge about HPV vaccine and inclusion in government immunization programmed may increase acceptability.

3.
Indian J Med Sci ; 2011 Dec; 65(12) 511-517
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-147804

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Mifepristone and misoprostol are the two drugs which are given at 36-48 h interval for medical abortion. This study was designed to study the efficacy of early administration of misoprostol (24 h after mifepristone) for medical termination of pregnancy less than 9 weeks and to compare this with standard protocol of mifepristone misoprostol combination at 48 h interval. Materials and Methods: Subjects for this single center prospective randomized case-control study were enrolled from the family planning outdoor patient department at our hospital with gestational age of less than 9 weeks. All subjects initially received 200 mg of oral mifepristone and then were randomly assigned to receive per vaginal 400 μg misoprostol at 24 h (study group) and 48 h (control group). They were then followed up after 14 days with transvaginal sonography to confirm completion of expulsion. Treatment was considered failed if surgical evacuation was needed for any indication. Primary outcome measure was success rate of the two treatment regimens. Results: Totally, 200 subjects were randomly allocated to each treatment arm (100 each). Complete expulsion was seen in 94% (94/100) in study group and 95% (95/100) in control group according to intention to treat analysis (P value ns). According to per protocol analysis success rate in study group was 93.6% and 94.3% in control group (P value ns). High failure rate after 7 weeks period of gestation in both the study and control group was found (26.3% and 30.0%; P value ns). Adverse effects were mostly similar in both the groups. Conclusion: Efficacy of mifepristone misoprostol combination at 24 h interval was similar to that at 48 h interval for medical abortion of pregnancy less than 9 weeks without compromising the safety (CTRI No. 2010/091/001422).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL